Friday, November 19, 2010
The War On Poverty Has A New Enemy... The Poor
1032: Bad Decision Then, Worse Now!
On November 2nd the United Methodist News Service hit us with the discouraging news that the United Methodist Judicial Council ruled (during its Oct. 27-30, 2010 meeting) that “a United Methodist pastor has the right to determine local church membership, even if the decision is based on whether the potential member is gay or lesbian” and “Annual (regional) conferences cannot limit that right or ask the church’s top court to set policy (full story at: http://www.umc.org/site/apps/nlnet/content3.aspx?c=lwL4KnN1LtH&b=525969&ct=8854503 UMNews service By Linda Bloom).” This, of course, is all relating back to Judicial Council Decision No. 1032, from Oct. 29, 2005, related to the case of the Rev. Ed Johnson, who had been the senior pastor at South Hill (Va.) United Methodist Church until he was placed on an involuntary leave of absence by the Virginia Annual Conference. You can read all about the case and the actual decision and rationale at: http://archives.umc.org/interior_judicial.asp?mid=263&JDID=1098&JDMOD=VWD&SN=1001&EN=1032.
Here are the problems as I see them:
1) The Judicial Council tries to wash its hands of any responsibility by stating that they “do not set policy” when it comes to UMC law. That statement is misleading. Decision 1032 does in fact set policy. A) It set the policy that a pastor has the right to decline membership based on prejudicial beliefs that are already outlined in the Discipline as against UM Church beliefs. B) It set policy in that it denied the right of an Annual Conference the due process of holding an individual clergy member accountable for their behavior in terms of prejudicial actions regarding church membership. C) It set policy in determining that an individual pastor has more authority, when it comes to church membership, than the ecclesiastical body which they joined and agreed would have the job of overseeing their actions (the Clergy Session of their Annual Conference).
2) Decision 1032 moves us even further towards “creeping congregationalism” and undermines our “connectionalism.” By giving an individual pastor (the senior pastor –remember the initial complaint came from Rev. Johnson’s associate pastor) the right to act as gate-keeper in terms of membership; and holding that right above all others (ie. accountability to the Annual Conference and clergy colleagues); the UMC becomes that much less connectional and accountable to one another.
3) The 2008 General Conference amended Paragraph 225 of the Discipline, replacing the word “may” with “shall.” The revised sentence reads: “A member in good standing in any Christian denomination who has been baptized and who desires to unite with The United Methodist Church shall be received as either a baptized or professing member.” By not revisiting Decision 1032 or at least amending it, the Judicial Council is allowing a ruling to stand which the General conference has tried to correct. This sets both precedent and policy for future cases and is the main reason why I believe the Judicial Council has made a bad decision worse at this point.
4) Most important of all… the United Methodist church continues to try to live a façade of inclusiveness (Article 4 of our constitution) while embracing structural policies of discrimination and alienation. The real cost of Decision 1032 lies in the human cost – the grace-filled, loving Christian people who continue to walk away from the UMC because of our hypocrisy and un-Christ-like actions. Yes, others will walk away if we become truly inclusive, but I would rather live by a set of standards that reflect Jesus’ love and ministry, than by hurtful policies of exclusion that may make some who ae already in the pews feel more comfortable in their prejudice! May dad always use to tell me to “beware the comfortable pew.” Speaking of which, whenever I did something wrong and/or self-serving and would make excuses or talk about how I was going to change or improve; my father would simply look me in the eyes and say, “don’t tell, show me.” Well judicial Council & UMC – it is past time to walk the walk! To read more about our hypocritical approach to Human Sexuality as it relates to Homosexuality, read what we have online about “What is the denominations position on homosexuality? (http://archives.umc.org/interior.asp?ptid=1&mid=1324).”
I can’t understand why the Judicial Council won’t revisit such a destructive, un-Christian and non-United Methodist (or so we say in so many other ways) decision, like 1032. It leaves me wondering if motivations might lie in the run-up to General Conference 2012 and the re-election bids of several of the Judicial Council members. Maybe it’s true that we tend to mirror culture and society much more than we lead and shape it. What a shame and what a loss for our God – the one who calls us to live, love and serve as Jesus did!
Respectfully & Sadly Written by
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Monday, August 23, 2010
Upcoming UNY MFSA Dinner
First Dinner Meeting of our new chapter!
Special Guest Speaker, Mark Miller
(www.markamillermusic.com)
Friday, September 10th
@ Trinity UMC in Albany
(Trinity is located at the corner of Lark & Lancaster Streets)
The evening will include:
*Elections of Steering Committee
*Special Guest Speaker, Mark Miller
*Presentation of the 1st annual Micah 6:8 Award
For planning purposes, it is important that you RSVP to UNYMFSA@yahoo.com